What does an MVP development company do?
An MVP development company takes a founder's product idea and builds the first launchable version — the minimum viable product. Shipkit handles scope definition, UX/UI design, full-stack development, authentication, payments, deployment, and code handoff, so a non-technical founder can launch without hiring or managing an in-house engineering team.
How much does it cost to hire an MVP development company?
US agencies typically bill $150-$250/hour, which puts a full MVP at $40,000-$100,000+ with scope risk. Shipkit works fixed-price from $14,900 for a production MVP up to $24,900+ for a custom platform build, with the total locked before development starts. Use the free MVP cost calculator for a budget range based on your actual scope.
MVP development company vs freelancer vs agency — which is right for me?
Freelancers are cheapest but carry delivery and continuity risk for a first launch. Traditional agencies offer depth but usually bill hourly with open-ended scope. A fixed-price MVP development company like Shipkit sits in between: agency-level delivery with a locked scope, milestone payments, and a known total — the safest fit for most non-technical founders shipping a first product.
What types of MVPs does Shipkit build?
Common projects include SaaS platforms, AI and LLM-powered tools, two-sided marketplaces, customer portals, operations dashboards, and internal tools. If you are unsure which path fits, the scoping call maps your idea to the smallest version-one build that can validate demand.
Will I own the code my MVP is built on?
Yes. Code and IP ownership are yours from day one, and the repository is yours from the start rather than at the end of the project. Full source code, deployment access, and documentation come with every Shipkit project. There is no vendor lock-in — you can keep working with Shipkit or move the codebase to another team at any time.
Do I need a technical cofounder before hiring an MVP development company?
No. Your job is to define the customer problem, the business priorities, and what version one has to prove. Shipkit covers the work a technical cofounder would do — architecture, stack selection, code review, deployment, and security decisions — and explains each trade-off in plain English instead of handing it back to you. Because the repository is yours rather than the studio's, a founder who later brings in a CTO hands over a documented codebase rather than a black box.
How much technical knowledge do I need to work with the team?
You need enough to steer the product, and none to build it. That means a clear view of who the user is and which flow matters most; you do not need to compare frameworks, review pull requests, or manage developers day to day. Scope, timeline, and technical trade-offs are presented in plain English at the weekly demo, where the working product itself is the status report.
Is fixed price better than hourly for MVP development?
For a first version, usually yes. A fixed price forces the scope to be settled before development starts and gives the founder a known total instead of a running meter. Hourly suits open-ended product teams with an in-house technical lead who can steer week to week, but on a first launch it puts both the scope risk and the estimating risk on the founder — the person least equipped to carry it. Shipkit quotes the whole build up front, so an estimate that turns out optimistic is the studio's problem, not a change order.
How do payments work on a fixed-price MVP?
The total is fixed and agreed before the build starts, and it is broken into the delivery stages that make up the project rather than billed against hours logged. A slower week does not change your invoice, and progress is visible in the weekly demo rather than in a timesheet. The stages, what counts as accepting each one, and the payment terms attached to them are written into the agreement next to the fixed price — ask for them on the scoping call.
Can you build an MVP from just an idea?
Yes — most Shipkit projects start from a rough idea rather than a written specification. The first step turns it into a lean version-one scope: one core user outcome, the smallest feature set that can validate demand, and an explicit list of what waits for version two. That scope is what the fixed price, the timeline, and the milestones are agreed against, before any build work starts — so the decision in front of you is how small version one has to be, not how many hours to buy.